diff --git a/7-Ways-Multitasking-Hurts-Brain-Health-And-Performance.md b/7-Ways-Multitasking-Hurts-Brain-Health-And-Performance.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..74ef9f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/7-Ways-Multitasking-Hurts-Brain-Health-And-Performance.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<br>Edited and medically reviewed by Patrick Alban,  [Mind Guard reviews](https://trevorjd.com/index.php/Benefits_Unintended_Effects_And_Dosage_Of_TMG_Supplements) DC. Written by Deane Alban. Multitasking is counterproductive, reduces cognitive performance, and  [Mind Guard reviews](https://wiki.ageofspace.net/doku.php?id=have_a_question_about_this_p_oduct) harms your [brain support supplement](https://yasinshakil.com/blockchain-and-web3-key-to-decentralized-internet/) and  [Mind Guard reviews](https://rentry.co/37600-everything-you-need-to-find-out-about-using-ceramides) mental well being. Discover ways to cease multitasking and  [best brain health supplement](https://www.xn--jj0bn3viuefqbv6k.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=7050317) get more performed. "I concern the day that technology will surpass human interplay. While there is a few doubt whether he ever stated these actual words, there is little doubt that expertise is altering our brains. And it’s usually agreed that it’s not for the better. Considered one of the biggest issues is what multitasking does to the [Mind Guard reviews](http://kuma.wisilicon.com:4000/reganrule21503/8673091/wiki/10-Natural-Ways-to-Increase-Your-Glutathione-Levels). In some ways, multitasking does more harm than good. We all multitask to some extent, a few of the time, but technology keeps pushing the envelope. The extent of my mother’s multitasking was stirring soup whereas she cradled a corded phone under her ear. But now, it’s not unusual for people to be engaged in several demanding activities at a time. With every passing year, it appears that there is extra to do and fewer time to do it.<br>
+
+<br>Multitasking seems to be the one approach to get every thing accomplished. But is it actually? If multitasking was an necessary innate talent, you’d assume there would have always been a word for it, right? But earlier than 1965, the phrase multitask didn't exist. The time period was first used when it appeared in an IBM paper describing the capabilities of a new computer system. During this similar decade, psychologists began learning the boundaries of human capability to process more than one set of stimuli at a time. Over time, multitasking has become a seemingly mandatory ability for staying competitive at work and in touch with associates and family. WHAT'S The perfect Brain Supplement? I hear this query typically. 1 Live a [brain support supplement](https://hlinnovative.com/cost-for-craftmanship-nostrum-exercitationem/)-healthy life-style first (Be Brain Fit tells you how). 2 Give [mind guard brain health supplement](http://classicalmusicmp3freedownload.com/ja/index.php?title=Best_Supplements_For_Brain_Health_Focus_And_Memory) Lab Pro a try. This brain complement meets all 12 of my requirements for a high-high quality brain supplement, together with effectiveness, safety, purity, and worth. So it is easier for you to be mentally sharper, positive, and more productive. Selecting the best [mind guard brain health supplement](http://www.nccproduction.com/wiki/omega-3_fatty_acid_supplements:an_impo_tant_piece_in_the_b_ain) supplement is all about high quality. See why I recommend Mind Lab Pro. People now satisfaction themselves on their capability to multitask. It’s not unusual for potential staff to list "ability to multitask" as considered one of their greatest attributes on job applications. But is it actually something to brag about? Humans are capable of doing two issues at a time, particularly when one of those actions is so ingrained that it may be finished on autopilot. Most of us can carry on a conversation while strolling, or drink espresso whereas driving. But what we can’t do is study or focus on two things without delay.<br>
+
+<br>Kimberly Beauregard was terrified of dropping her memory as she entered her 60s. When she saw commercials for Prevagen a couple of years in the past, they impressed her. "Can a protein originally found in a jellyfish improve your memory? " asks the voice-over in a single industrial that used to air on prime-time Tv. "Our scientists say sure." The advert cuts from a swarm of the glowing blue sea creatures to scenes of individuals in white lab coats, smiling senior citizens, and a final assurance that Prevagen has been clinically proven to improve memory. "It was enough to make me say this is sweet,  [Mind Guard reviews](http://39.108.93.0/maurinecropper/mind-guard-supplement2132/wiki/Health-Benefits-Of-Garlic) there’s going to be some profit to it," Beauregard stated. She wasn’t alone in that religion. Three million persons are estimated to have bought Prevagen because it was first launched by Quincy Bioscience, a Wisconsin-primarily based producer, in 2007. Sales reached $165 million by mid-2015, and the company claims Prevagen is now a "best-selling branded memory supplement in chain drug shops across the United States." A month’s provide of the "extra strength" variety retails for about $60 at Walgreens, CVS, and Walmart.<br>
+
+<br>Beauregard took Prevagen every single day for 9 months, spending round $500 in all, however mentioned she hadn’t seen any reminiscence enchancment. Quincy Bioscience has been sued a number of instances over allegations of false advertising for Prevagen, together with by the government. After listening to about the lawsuits, Beauregard says she felt like her worst nightmare-of losing her reminiscences-had been exploited by Quincy. "They virtually performed on that fear, actually,  [Mind Guard reviews](https://trevorjd.com/index.php/User:Krystle53D) to earn cash," she mentioned. She’s not alone there, both. Well over half of American adults take supplements, but there are many misconceptions about the business and the way it’s regulated. In a 2019 survey by Pew Charitable Trusts, more than half the respondents believed that the Food and Drug Administration either assessments supplements for safety or should approve products earlier than they are bought. Neither is true. Instead, the FDA largely relies on reporting by the businesses and consumers, as well as its own inspections, to spot potential problems as soon as supplements are on the market.<br>
+
+<br>Commercials for Prevagen have insisted that "it’s secure and efficient," an assurance Quincy echoed to regulators. But an investigation by WIRED now exhibits that for years officials on the FDA questioned the basis for the company’s claims. Multiple FDA inspections, most of which haven't been reported earlier than, found important issues with Quincy’s manufacturing processes, complaint handling, and the quality control testing that was supposed to ensure its products have been safe. And hundreds of Americans have reported experiencing "adverse events" while taking Prevagen, including seizures, strokes, coronary heart arrhythmias, chest pain, and dizziness. While the existence of adverse event stories alone don’t show a product is the cause, the nature and sample of complaints about Prevagen fearful FDA officials, in keeping with agency records. Other than a warning letter sent to Quincy in 2012, the FDA has not publicly indicated it had any issues about Prevagen. The company determined in 2018 that Quincy addressed the violations cited in the warning letter.<br>
\ No newline at end of file